Saturday, July 3, 2010

Complaint after Cherie Booth spares religious man jail

Complaint after Cherie Booth spares religious man jail

Cherie Blair
The National Secular Society said Ms Booth gave an "unjust" sentence

A secularist group has lodged an official complaint against Cherie Booth QC after she spared a man from prison because he was religious.

Shamso Miah, 25, of Redbridge, east London, broke a man's jaw following a row in a bank queue.

Sitting as a judge, Ms Booth - wife of former Prime Minister Tony Blair - said she would suspend his sentence on the basis of his religious belief.

The National Secular Society claims her attitude was discriminatory and unjust.

'Acceptable behaviour'

Inner London Crown Court heard that Miah, 25, of Redbridge, east London, went into a bank in East Ham and became embroiled in a dispute with Mohammed Furcan about who was next in the queue.

Miah - who had just been to a mosque - punched Mr Furcan inside the bank, and again outside the building.

Ms Booth told Miah that violence had to be taken seriously, but said she would suspend his prison sentence because he was a religious person and had not been in trouble before.

She added: "You are a religious man and you know this is not acceptable behaviour."

The National Secular Society has complained to the Office for Judicial Complaints, suggesting that Mrs Blair acted in an unjust and discriminatory way, and suggesting that she might have treated a non-religious person less leniently.

Page last updated at 06:00 GMT, Thursday, 4 February 2010


  1. The complete trash can is a gigantic buffet that you can eat for insects and other pests. You should not let your whole harvest sit in your kitchen for more than a day. Take it out once pest removal is complete.
    شركة مكافحة حشرات
    شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بالخبر
    شركة مكافحة حشرات بالخبر
    شركة رش مبيدات بالخبر

  2. Examine the story of the religious man who complained to Cherie Booth but was not put in jail. Visit our website frequently for in-depth reporting and analysis. That you thought the article was interesting makes me very happy! It's a really good point that I hadn't thought of before. Your input gives the conversation a new perspective.